Deuteronomy’s Conception of Law as an „Ideal Type“: A Missing Chapter in the History of Constitutional Law

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Levinson, Bernard M.
Contributors: Skaist, A. (Editor)
Format: Print Article
In:Judge and Society in Antiquity
Year: 2006, Pages: 83-119
KeiBi Identifier:65:670
Further subjects:Konferenzschrift
LEADER 00936naa a22002652 4500
001 KEI00003426
005 20230711085024.0
008 111207s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||ger c
100 |a Levinson, Bernard M.  |4 aut  |e VerfasserIn 
245 |a Deuteronomy’s Conception of Law as an „Ideal Type“: A Missing Chapter in the History of Constitutional Law 
264 |c 2006 
655 7 |a Konferenzschrift 
700 |a Skaist, A.  |4 edt  |e HerausgeberIn 
773 1 8 |a Judge and Society in Antiquity 
936 u w |h 83-119  |j 2006 
BIB |a Levinson2006 
BIT |a inproceedings 
HRW |a 0 
KEI |b 670 
KEI |a 65:1121 
RAW |a Levinson, Bernard M., Deuteronomy’s Conception of Law as an „Ideal Type“: A Missing Chapter in the History of Constitutional Law: Skaist, A. – Levinson, B.M. (Hg.), Judge and Society in Antiquity (2006) [65:1121] 83-119. 
STA |a OK 
UID |a 3426 
USR |a 7 
VOL |a 65